What’s in a picture?

A picture’s worth a thou­sand words. Behind gifted eyes, is a vision, a gen­tle whis­per from the heart, an artist’s soul. Like the deaf­en­ing silence in a vibrant dream,

…every pic­ture tells a story with a dif­fer­ent point of view.

The Journal of Fine Imagery

by WILL WIRIAWAN

'Here It Is' by McCarty PhotoWorks
© Brian McCarty

Fascinating work of pas­sion by a Memphis-born toy pho­tog­ra­pher Brian McCarty.

Charles Bronson – The Man with a Camera

Charles Bronson, before he was the Charles Bronson.

Jack Brabham Racing in the rain

Exquisite col­lec­tion of vin­tage F1 pho­tographs. And some more here.

(Uncredited photo, source: ive­g­ot­my­towel)

In his own words:

What we do know is that we live in a world where a cam­era, far from being the shield for the press that it once was, is now often seen as a tar­get in con­flict sit­u­a­tions. Rather than be safe­guarded, we become the tar­get. That cre­ates a new world of unease and mys­tery for those work­ing in places where just being a pho­tog­ra­pher puts you at risk. It requires an extra sense of self, and smarts, to be able to not only make the pic­tures, but safely get them, and one­self, out.

I have linked to David’s work a num­ber of times here, but I rarely read his words. This one, a 2-part score by John Camp is not to be missed.

I have owned three gen­er­a­tions of MacBook Pro Unibody and all three gen­er­ates a sub­tle but annoy­ing click­ing noise after a long use and increases fre­quency as I click the touch­pad or typ­ing with it on my lap. Luckily I am not the only one with such prob­lem, and if you own a recent 15″ model MacBook Pro there’s a good chance you are expe­ri­enc­ing it too. Here’s a YouTube record­ing of the noise.

Ten One Blog dis­cov­ered the source of the noise (no, it’s not the sud­den motion sen­sor) and found a per­ma­nent fix:

One of the con­nec­tors in this sys­tem touches the bot­tom plate right in the cen­ter where it flexes a lot. When the com­puter heats up, the metal pins in the con­nec­tor scrape nois­ily against the cover and chas­sis. It makes you want to eat your hands.

By remov­ing the con­nec­tor (two easy screws!), you remove one of the ground­ing con­nec­tions between the uni­body enclo­sure and the bot­tom cover.

I chose not to remove the con­nec­tor but to stick an elec­tri­cal tape on the back of the bot­tom case where the con­nec­tor touches, which seems to have fixed the problem.

Jump to the linked post for some pic­tures and more details.

From usabil­ity per­spec­tive, pro­gres­sive is usu­ally good, because the user gets feed­back that some­thing is going on. Also if you’re on a slow con­nec­tion, pro­gres­sive JPEG is prefer­able because you don’t need to wait for the whole image to arrive in order to get an idea if it is what you wanted. If not, you can click away from the page or hit the back but­ton, with­out wait­ing for the (poten­tially large) high qual­ity image.

Bottomline: Progressive JPEG is the ticket to flaw­lessly serve retina-quality pho­tos for the new iPad today.

Today is that day. Have a glo­ri­ous Nyepi, my dear Balinese friends.

Thus the Web Begins Resolutionizing

Friday, March 23 2012

The new iPad Retina Display - Courtesy of Apple
© Apple

The prob­lem began when the web goes mobile.

And as mobile screen res­o­lu­tion goes higher web work­ers have tried to find a good solu­tion to han­dle designs on dif­fer­ent screen res­o­lu­tions in a smart way.

For the lack of a bet­ter term, some­one coined the term ‘Responsive Web Design’.

Then there’s another prob­lem: How to prop­erly scale images for dif­fer­ent res­o­lu­tion? The puz­zle con­tin­ues and the term stuck. ‘Responsive images’ became the topic in cof­fee shops and break­fast meets.

As Jason Grigsby explains nicely there’s actu­ally no good solu­tion but sev­eral prag­matic tech­niques to patch this world-wide gap.

But then the new iPad came out.

iPad’s gor­geous retina dis­play is one giant beast. At 264ppi, its 2048 * 1536 screen res­o­lu­tion is hun­gry for pix­els. Wait, isn’t that the den­sity of full-size images? No, not exactly, but close.

While pho­tog­ra­pher Duncan Davidson was attempt­ing to future-proof his web­sites, he came across an inter­est­ing prob­lem:

Relatively small high-resolution images—such as John Gruber’s Daring Fireball logo—work great. But 2000-pixel wide pho­tographs failed mis­er­ably and ended up look­ing worse than the 1000-pixel wide images they were replac­ing in my test pages. Much worse, in fact.

[…]

Bottom line, how­ever, is that there’s a limit to serv­ing up web images in JPG for­mat with WebKit the new iPad and the limit kicks in when you approach screen-filling resolutions.

His post is a good home base for your research in this topic, which includes the two links above on respon­sive imgs. Interestingly, there’s another arti­cle by Jason Grigsby detail­ing how Apple solves their prob­lem. I also found an active dis­cus­sion on Apple Support Communities that dis­cusses image size and how it relates to the web on retina displays.

Now that I’ve done some read­ing, I got some home­work to do.



The Dawn of Shanghai, 1973

Fascinating two-part film on the early days of Shanghai, when they were still encour­aged to have ‘no more than two children.”

Three bil­lion pop­u­la­tion and forty years later, it’s eco­nom­i­cally imprac­ti­cal two have a sec­ond child. (via China Stories)

New UI design & engine, content-aware and includes the new Camera RAW with adap­tive wide angle, field blur & tilt-shift capability.

The down­load size is mas­sive: 984 MB for Mac, and 1.7 GB for Windows. I’m curi­ous as per why the Mac ver­sion is only half the size of the Windows download.

Page 2 of 53123456121824Last →