What’s in a picture?

A picture’s worth a thou­sand words. Behind gifted eyes, is a vision, a gen­tle whis­per from the heart, an artist’s soul. Like the deaf­en­ing silence in a vibrant dream,

…every pic­ture tells a story with a dif­fer­ent point of view.

Articles

Written by WILL WIRIAWAN

Friday, October 7 2011

Steve Jobs and the Truth

William Mercer McLeod, then an assis­tant for Ed Kashi:

“It was in the late 80s. Jobs walked into the photo shoot and started mov­ing the lights around. Then he picked up the phone and called the art direc­tor in New York and said he wanted to do some­thing different.”

A sub­ject who are being dif­fi­cult in a photo shoot means that he or she knows what they want. It is the best pos­si­ble sub­ject a keen por­traitist could hope1.

I would ask the same ques­tion every time my edi­tors call for an [edi­to­r­ial] assign­ment: “What is the sub­ject, and what is your story?” I’d learn over the years that less edi­tors would call, but more inter­est­ing assign­ments were on the table. Those who con­tinue to call usu­ally are the ones who put their trust and also gave me edi­to­r­ial free­dom to do what­ever I want.

Steve would have to deal with me, given such case.

I can imag­ine what it would be like for the rep­utable Ed Kashi to be treated that way, but ask your­self this: is it even your story to tell, or our subject’s? I kept ask­ing that ques­tion, repeat­edly in between photo shoots, albeit a car, peo­ple, a room or a build­ing, and the answers always came back strong: I am just an observer to all of this, a clear piece of glass to the win­dow that frames the story to our audiences.

It is when I kept my ego at bay that I begin to see the truth. It is only when I step back from the frame that I see who peo­ple truly are, the mask peo­ple are wear­ing, the goals and ambi­tions they want to achieve, and the real truth beyond all the mask and their ego-ridden self.

There is noth­ing more impor­tant, more inter­est­ing, or more pow­er­ful and more joy­ful than a truth­ful story.

And that’s why, I think Steve didn’t treat Albert Watson like he did Ed Kashi2:

The one thing I insisted on was that we have a three hour win­dow of set up time. We were prepared…we set up to make [every shoot] as greased light­ning fast as pos­si­ble for the [sub­ject]. I also read a mas­sive amount of stuff about Jobs to help con­cep­tu­al­ize the shoot, and to be able to con­verse with Jobs intel­li­gently. When Steve walked in, his power, charisma and genius were pal­pa­ble. It was like when Clint Eastwood walks in to the room: “Wow, you’re shoot­ing film.” “I don’t feel like dig­i­tal is quite here yet.“ “I agree.” Steve said, then he turned to Watson and added, “But we’ll get there“

It was 2008, and Steve may have grown to be more care­ful with his remarks, but it was clear that they both had an equally respect­ful stand to each other, an under­stand­ing that made the ses­sions enjoy­able and fluid:

What do you want me to do?” asked Steve. “Think about the next project you have on the table, think about instances where peo­ple would chal­lenge you” replied Watson.

The ses­sion went longer than Steve ever gave to most pho­tog­ra­phers, and the cho­sen pho­to­graph became the wit­ness to the con­nec­tion between Steve and Watson, and it por­trayed the per­sona that obvi­ously Steve and peo­ple around him at Apple knows as he is, the truth beyond all pub­lic image that peo­ple would ren­der, the final pic­ture to mark an end of an era, the one pic­ture that would be the last­ing mem­ory of Steve and his story.

  1. Easier-to-deal-with sub­jects are mostly those who wears a thick mask to shield their truth.
  2. Quoted pas­sages are (re)paraphrased for con­text, as the orig­i­nals are edited with com­men­taries by the orig­i­nal author of the post